This study analyses five leading English cases in a comparative and economic way and questions the validity of their assumptions as well as their arguments in the light of the recent important decision of the Strasbourg Court of Human Rights in Osman v. UK.
This thought-provoking book, written by two English academics from Oxford and Cambridge Universities, in collaboration with two leading authorities from the Universities of Paris and Munich, should provide food for thought for judges, practitioners, academics and students for years to come.
This book will be essential reading for scholars and practitioners interested in public law, human rights, comparative methodology, and tort law.
Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more
This study analyses five leading English cases in a comparative and economic way and questions the validity of their assumptions as well as their arguments in the light of the recent important decision of the Strasbourg Court of Human Rights in Osman v. UK.
This thought-provoking book, written by two English academics from Oxford and Cambridge Universities, in collaboration with two leading authorities from the Universities of Paris and Munich, should provide food for thought for judges, practitioners, academics and students for years to come.
This book will be essential reading for scholars and practitioners interested in public law, human rights, comparative methodology, and tort law.
Imprint | Hart Publishing |
Country of origin | United Kingdom |
Release date | November 1999 |
Availability | Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days |
First published | 1999 |
Authors | Basil S. Markesinis, Dagmar Coester-Waltjen, Jean-Bernard Auby, Simon Deakin |
Dimensions | 129 x 194 x 14mm (L x W x T) |
Format | Hardcover |
Pages | 184 |
ISBN-13 | 978-1-84113-124-5 |
Barcode | 9781841131245 |
Categories | |
LSN | 1-84113-124-5 |